What does the decision by the International Court of Justice in South Africa’s case against Israel actually mean?
Does it matter that the word ‘ceasefire’ wasn’t mentioned? What are its actual legal implications?
On January 26, the ICJ announced its ruling in the case that South Africa has brought against Israel, accusing it of committing a crime of genocide against the people in Gaza.
What the court provided were provisional measures: in short, it wasn’t a “Yes” or “No” on the crime of genocide itself, but whether there was a basis to further investigate what the lawyers representing South Africa had brought to the table, and any measures the court would order according to their decision.
After a long deconstruction of the claims of both South Africa and what Israel has presented as its defense, the verdict came.
It upheld what South Africa had presented.
The court has ruled that there is a basis for South Africa’s claims.
For the first time in more than 75 years, Israel was ordered – ordered anything – by an international court and, in this case, the highest court there is.
But what does it actually mean?
To better understand what this decision means, I invite you to listen to two experts in the field, facilitated by a host whose work I’ve discovered (embarrassingly) recently and can recommend already.
Craig Mokhiber is an International Human Rights lawyer with credentials as impressive as they can get. Until recently, he was the Director of the New York Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) until he resigned in protest of inaction towards the unfolding genocide in Gaza. Follow him on Twitter here.
Norman Finkelstein is a political scientist, author, activist, and expert on anything Gaza-related. Coming from a Holocaust survivor family, he has been speaking out against Israel’s oppression for decades now. Follow him and his work here.
Katie Halper is a writer, political commentator, and host of several shows including The Katie Halper Show, on which Norman and Craig appear.
In their conversation, they cover a lot: what was actually said at the ruling, what judges voted which way, what it means and doesn’t mean in legal terms, what it means historically, and so much more.
I hope you take the time to learn more about his historic case. And, as importantly, I hope you take action against genocide today.
I’ll leave you with an emotional video to allow ourselves to celebrate, together, even if it’s just for 53 seconds:
Stay strong, check on others, and keep your heart open.
❤️💔❤️
Justina
Find all my work on Palestine here.
Find my episode on what this case has revealed to the world:
Latest from the Blog
Israel’s Attacks on Rafah: No ‘Red Lines’, Only Mass Killing Supported by The West
The ones who have the power to stop it are choosing not to: with its invasion of Rafah, Israel has proven not only that it has only contempt for the International Law (something it didn’t really need to prove), but that our governments are gladly falling into the abyss of Fascism as they continue to…
What Protests on Campuses against Israel’s Genocide in Gaza Have Revealed
Fascism at home protecting a Fascist regime in Israel: this is just one of the things that have become clear as police brutality is being unleashed onto students across the US and abroad who are protesting their universities’ role in Israel’s genocide in Gaza.
Do You Listen to Fascists or Do You Listen to Legal Scholars?
I have never seen so much of disregard and even contempt for International Law from people who we would expect to at least pretend to care about it. That façade crumbles when people start defend Israel’s genocide in Gaza and, by doing so, so often let their Fascist views show. The question for you is:…
The Exploding Head Blog & Podcast 
One thought on “A Recommended Resource to Understand What The ICJ Decision Means”