What does the decision by the International Court of Justice in South Africa’s case against Israel actually mean?
Does it matter that the word ‘ceasefire’ wasn’t mentioned? What are its actual legal implications?
On January 26, the ICJ announced its ruling in the case that South Africa has brought against Israel, accusing it of committing a crime of genocide against the people in Gaza.
What the court provided were provisional measures: in short, it wasn’t a “Yes” or “No” on the crime of genocide itself, but whether there was a basis to further investigate what the lawyers representing South Africa had brought to the table, and any measures the court would order according to their decision.
After a long deconstruction of the claims of both South Africa and what Israel has presented as its defense, the verdict came.
It upheld what South Africa had presented.
The court has ruled that there is a basis for South Africa’s claims.
For the first time in more than 75 years, Israel was ordered – ordered anything – by an international court and, in this case, the highest court there is.
But what does it actually mean?
To better understand what this decision means, I invite you to listen to two experts in the field, facilitated by a host whose work I’ve discovered (embarrassingly) recently and can recommend already.
Craig Mokhiber is an International Human Rights lawyer with credentials as impressive as they can get. Until recently, he was the Director of the New York Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) until he resigned in protest of inaction towards the unfolding genocide in Gaza. Follow him on Twitter here.
Norman Finkelstein is a political scientist, author, activist, and expert on anything Gaza-related. Coming from a Holocaust survivor family, he has been speaking out against Israel’s oppression for decades now. Follow him and his work here.
Katie Halper is a writer, political commentator, and host of several shows including The Katie Halper Show, on which Norman and Craig appear.
In their conversation, they cover a lot: what was actually said at the ruling, what judges voted which way, what it means and doesn’t mean in legal terms, what it means historically, and so much more.
I hope you take the time to learn more about his historic case. And, as importantly, I hope you take action against genocide today.
I’ll leave you with an emotional video to allow ourselves to celebrate, together, even if it’s just for 53 seconds:
Stay strong, check on others, and keep your heart open.
❤️💔❤️
Justina
Find all my work on Palestine here.
Find my episode on what this case has revealed to the world:
Latest from the Blog
Updates On The Global Sumud Flotilla: Saif and Thiago Are Free
After their kidnapping and illegal detention in Israel, Saif Abu Keshek and Thiago Avila have been released. Our global pressure worked. But our work is far from over.
On The Global Sumud Flotilla, What The World with Israel in It Looks Like, And What It Does to Our Nervous Systems
To exist in the world where Israel, too, exists – to physically be and function in such a world – is hard on our nervous systems. The new horrors of the kidnapping of Thiago Avila and Saif Abu Keshek are yet another reminder of how that heaviness won’t go away, as long as Israel -…
How Did Jon Stewart Miss The Greatest Piece of Satire on His Show?
Here’s a reminder that choosing to interview someone who history – and, hopefully, the ICJ – will remember as a war criminal and a genocide enabler, like Annalena Baerbock, is very much not cool. Especially when you have a massive platform.
The Exploding Head Media 
One thought on “A Recommended Resource to Understand What The ICJ Decision Means”