Israeli soldiers patrolling in Hebron, a Palestinian city that has an illegal settlement inside and streets where Palestinians are not allowed (photo credits: me)
It’s a system of apartheid.
This is how Human Rights Watch has summarised its extensive report documenting how the Israeli government treats Palestinians living both inside of Israel and in the Occupied Territories.
This is in fact the first time Human Rights Watch (HRW) has used ‘apartheid’ in its reporting.
The report, A Threshold Crossed, released on April 27, 2021, documents and summarises the policies of the Israeli government that, according to the definition of apartheid as stated in the UN Apartheid Convention and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), constitutes this crime.
In my a bit longer than usual episode, I aim to do the following:
- present the definition of apartheid used by HRW (based on the above-mentioned documents),
- summarise several points of HRW findings that I myself hadn’t mentioned in my previous episodes,
- point to broader questions that we have to ask countries regarding what international organisations say about them.
Since I originally released this episode, two more prominent bodies – Amnesty International and The International Human Rights Clinic at Harward Law School – had the same conclusions in their reports on Israeli state policies.
(Please feel free to download this visual and share it on your social media)
Even before that, different organisations – for example, B’Tselem – have accused Israel of committing the crime of apartheid.
References:
- Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
- The UN Apartheid Convention (it’s not a long document, check it out)
- Legality of Israel’s Policy Regarding the Revocation of Residency in East Jerusalem, a document by the legal team of the Norwegian Refugee Council
- Planning Policy in The West Bank, by B’Tselem, an Israeli human rights organisation
- Residency Revocation: Israel’s Forcible Transfer of Palestinians from Jerusalem, by Al-Haq, a Palestinian human rights organisation.
Subscribe to receive my articles directly to your inbox here:
Latest from the Blog
Where The Swings Between A Human-Centric and A Fascist Government Will Stop in Colombia
The results of the presidential elections in Colombia today will determine not only where the country is going, but whether the world will keep a loud anticolonial, anti-imperial, and antizionist government.
Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya and Palestinian Sumud in The Courts of The Occupier
As Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya appeared via video in the Israeli Supreme Court, I invite you to name what we’re actually seeing: resistance against a fascist apartheid regime, enabled by our governments.
How The World Cup in a Fascist Country Looks, and How Nothing Can Be Expected of FIFA
How the U.S. is treating athletes coming to compete in the World Cup would only be surprising to those who either don’t know too much about rise of fascism in the U.S., or the history of FIFA itself.
An Interview on Iran and Israel You Have to See
This is an absolute must-watch: Jeremy Scahill, one of the few journalists who interviews and is trusted by various actors, including the Iranian government, talks to Samir Mohyeddin about the U.S.-Iranian negotiations and Israel’s “fragile ceasefires” in Gaza and Lebanon. It’s a conversation good for our brains and conscience.
When Words Become Both The Representation And The Represented
The simplest propaganda technique – blatant lies – might be all that Israel and its supporters have left in their toolbox. Yet words with no meaning is what our leaders, too, have been resorting to for years now, following Israel itself.
Israel: The Only Country Whose Actions Never Represent Itself
If it is not its ministers, navy, police, prison guards, people marching on the streets, nor settlers protected by the army, who, then, actually represents Israel?
The Exploding Head Media 
3 thoughts on “What Do We Talk About When We Talk About Palestine? Part 4: International Organisations”