Israeli soldiers patrolling in Hebron, a Palestinian city that has an illegal settlement inside and streets where Palestinians are not allowed (photo credits: me)
It’s a system of apartheid.
This is how Human Rights Watch has summarised its extensive report documenting how the Israeli government treats Palestinians living both inside of Israel and in the Occupied Territories.
This is in fact the first time Human Rights Watch (HRW) has used ‘apartheid’ in its reporting.
The report, A Threshold Crossed, released on April 27, 2021, documents and summarises the policies of the Israeli government that, according to the definition of apartheid as stated in the UN Apartheid Convention and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), constitutes this crime.
In my a bit longer than usual episode, I aim to do the following:
- present the definition of apartheid used by HRW (based on the above-mentioned documents),
- summarise several points of HRW findings that I myself hadn’t mentioned in my previous episodes,
- point to broader questions that we have to ask countries regarding what international organisations say about them.
Since I originally released this episode, two more prominent bodies – Amnesty International and The International Human Rights Clinic at Harward Law School – had the same conclusions in their reports on Israeli state policies.
(Please feel free to download this visual and share it on your social media)
Even before that, different organisations – for example, B’Tselem – have accused Israel of committing the crime of apartheid.
References:
- Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
- The UN Apartheid Convention (it’s not a long document, check it out)
- Legality of Israel’s Policy Regarding the Revocation of Residency in East Jerusalem, a document by the legal team of the Norwegian Refugee Council
- Planning Policy in The West Bank, by B’Tselem, an Israeli human rights organisation
- Residency Revocation: Israel’s Forcible Transfer of Palestinians from Jerusalem, by Al-Haq, a Palestinian human rights organisation.
Subscribe to receive my articles directly to your inbox here:
Latest from the Blog
What, According to My Government, Other Countries Can Learn from Israel
This is the most straightforward way I can put it: just like there are countries in history known for their collaboration with the Nazi regime, my country, Lithuania, has inscribed itself as one of the staunchest supporters of Israel, no matter the scale, depravity, or geography of its crimes. See if my rage resonates with…
Invest in Decolonising Narratives
Something incredible is happening in Panama – in that how anticolonial it is. I’m inviting you to support it.
What Israel’s Destruction of Lebanon Is Showing Us Painfully Clearly
When Israel shows only contempt for what its greater ally wants, we need no more proof is there’s anything above Israel’s colonial expansionist ambitions.
On Iran, (Ir)rationality, and Those Who Didn’t See Any Destabilisation of The Region in Israel’s Genocide
Remember when Iran used to be called an irrational, unpredictable actor? Well, I invite you to notice any changes when it comes to irrationality, constructed narratives, and how war propaganda looks these days.
On One of The Gravest Crimes against Humanity That Not Every Country Chose to Condemn at The UN
The UN just voted to describe the transatlantic slave trade as ‘the gravest crime against humanity’. Yet not every country, according to its vote, agrees. My commentary is on what the abstentions show.
Your Antiwar Voice Is Needed More Than You Might Think
The war machine won’t stop until it’s stopped, just as its propaganda won’t just disappear on its own. It was to be actively pointed to, deconstructed, and rejected as loudly as possible. And this is where everyone’s voice matters.
The Exploding Head Media 
3 thoughts on “What Do We Talk About When We Talk About Palestine? Part 4: International Organisations”