Is Your Country Slipping Into Authoritarianism?

How does a country fall from the podium of democracy?

And is it always a sudden fall?

It’s easy to point to regimes that are known for their human rights abuses, lack of access to democratic practices, and more clearly identified types of oppression.

Yet here we have to remember two things:

One, just because something isn’t “clearly identified” it doesn’t mean it’s not there.

And two, countries don’t necessarily become authoritarian suddenly. And this is what I’d like to explore with you today.

Where should we look to see if our countries are slipping into authoritarianism?

In political science, one of the words for this process is de-democratisation.

If democratisation can be defined as an increasing strengthening of a country’s democratic institutions and practices, then you might guess what de-democratisation is. It’s the opposite:

It’s the process of dismantling those same institutions and processes.

When it’s not something sudden and obvious, like a military coup, but a gradual process, it can be more difficult to spot, point a finger at, and name.  

What can that gradual process entail?

To answer that, we have to first ask what democracy is in the first place.
Unfortunately, and maybe unexpectedly to some, in political science, the definition of democracy is not as straightforward as you might think.

There’s an article I would recommend for the extra-curious ones, by David Collier and Steven Levitsky, called “Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research.” Among other issues, it discusses conceptual stretching that may occur when categorising regimes: how the quest to define and categorise democracies has led to “democracy with adjectives,” resulting in subtypes like “authoritarian democracy” (exactly). 

In short, if political science can’t provide us with one single definition, I definitely can’t.

However, there are surely elements of a political system that make it more democratic. There are a number of attributes that, when accumulated, place a regime on a spectrum. It has some kind of ideal liberal democracy at one end and authoritarianism at the other. 

Here are some examples of such attributes: 

• Access to voting: let’s assess voting laws and voter suppression policies,
• Media freedom: let’s look into media ownership and how concentrated it is; the physical safety of journalists; are they being jailed or prosecuted for exposing your country’s war crimes? (remember Julian Assange?)
• Separation of branches of the government: for example, are the courts independent?

There are two more attributes that I’d like to draw your attention to as they might be resonating with you more strongly these days. Perhaps it’s something you’ve witnessed but didn’t know how to call, under which conceptual umbrella to place it. What’s truly saddening is that it’s not a single-country issue. But let me get back to these attributes of democratic regimes:

• Forces that are used for external protection should not be used for internal control: for example, is the army brought to the streets to suppress protests? How militarised is the police?

• How political losers deal with a loss: for example, does a party or an individual who lost an election accept their defeat, or do they claim the election was rigged? If they were in power before, do they agree to leave? In well-established democracies, the losers tend to accept the outcome more readily because they generally trust the political process.

In short, to see any of these happen is a big deal. It becomes more than concerning actions within a system: it might be a move towards a different system whatsoever.

And it should be equally scary if these steps are being taken by someone you approve of or disapprove of. This leads us to an important disclaimer:

De-democratisation doesn’t mean a party you didn’t support is in power.

It doesn’t even refer to someone holding rather terrifying political beliefs being in power – even the most hateful politician might not engage in de-democratisation. 

We shouldn’t be ringing that de-democratisation bell unfairly. But when it happens, we have to be vigilant. 

• Instagram
• LinkedIn
• Twitter
• Spotify
• TikTok
• YouTube

Read my latest articles here:

• An Interview on Iran and Israel You Have to See
  This is an absolute must-watch: Jeremy Scahill, one of the few journalists who interviews and is trusted by various actors, including the Iranian government, talks to Samir Mohyeddin about the U.S.-Iranian negotiations and Israel’s “fragile ceasefires” in Gaza and Lebanon. It’s a conversation good for our brains and conscience.
• When Words Become Both The Representation And The Represented
  The simplest propaganda technique – blatant lies – might be all that Israel and its supporters have left in their toolbox. Yet words with no meaning is what our leaders, too, have been resorting to for years now, following Israel itself.
• Israel: The Only Country Whose Actions Never Represent Itself
  If it is not its ministers, navy, police, prison guards, people marching on the streets, nor settlers protected by the army, who, then, actually represents Israel?
• Updates On The Global Sumud Flotilla: Saif and Thiago Are Free
  After their kidnapping and illegal detention in Israel, Saif Abu Keshek and Thiago Avila have been released. Our global pressure worked. But our work is far from over.
• On The Global Sumud Flotilla, What The World with Israel in It Looks Like, And What It Does to Our Nervous Systems
  To exist in the world where Israel, too, exists – to physically be and function in such a world – is hard on our nervous systems. The new horrors of the kidnapping of Thiago Avila and Saif Abu Keshek are yet another reminder of how that heaviness won’t go away, as long as Israel – as a colonial, apartheid, fascist political entity – exists.
• How Did Jon Stewart Miss The Greatest Piece of Satire on His Show?
  Here’s a reminder that choosing to interview someone who history – and, hopefully, the ICJ – will remember as a war criminal and a genocide enabler, like Annalena Baerbock, is very much not cool. Especially when you have a massive platform.