Iran, Ukraine, And Logical Fallacies

When we talk about politics, can we hold space for nuances and not jump into accusing people of something they don’t mean?

Can we recognise when someone is using a claim that is simply illogical?

This is hugely important — and not only when we talk about politics.

If our aim is to understand what other people are saying and only then see if we agree or disagree with them, then this is crucial.

In my episode, I talk about all this using examples from debates and discourses about Iran and Ukraine.

You can find the episode on types of political change that I reference in my episode here and my episodes and articles on Ukraine here.

Latest from the Blog

What, According to My Government, Other Countries Can Learn from Israel

This is the most straightforward way I can put it: just like there are countries in history known for their collaboration with the Nazi regime, my country, Lithuania, has inscribed itself as one of the staunchest supporters of Israel, no matter the scale, depravity, or geography of its crimes. See if my rage resonates with…

Invest in Decolonising Narratives

Something incredible is happening in Panama – in that how anticolonial it is. I’m inviting you to support it.

Your Antiwar Voice Is Needed More Than You Might Think

The war machine won’t stop until it’s stopped, just as its propaganda won’t just disappear on its own. It was to be actively pointed to, deconstructed, and rejected as loudly as possible. And this is where everyone’s voice matters.

Don’t miss an update! Follow The Exploding Head

Get new content delivered directly to your inbox.





Published by Justina Poskeviciute

Justina is an independent political commentator, writer, and nonprofit professional, with a focus on anticolonial, feminist, antiwar, and climate-justice movements.

Leave a comment